Episode 11

#11 - Debating Existential Risk


September 16th, 2020

1 hr 29 mins 17 secs

Your Hosts

About this Episode

Vaden's arguments against Bayesian philosophy and existential risk are examined by someone who might actually know what they're talking about, i.e., not Ben. After writing a critique of our conversation in Episode 7, which started off a series of blog posts, our good friend Mauricio (who studies political science, economics, and philosophy) kindly agrees to come on the podcast and try to figure out who's more confused. Does Vaden convert?

We apologize for the long wait between this episode and the last one. It was all Vaden's fault.

Hit us up at incrementspodcast@gmail.com!

Note from Vaden:  Upon relistening, I've just learned my new computer chair clicks in the most annoying possible way every time I get enthusiastic. My apologies - I'll work on being less enthusiastic in future episodes.  

Second note from Vaden: Yeesh lots of audio issues with this episode - I replaced the file with a cleaned up version at 5:30pm September 17th. Still learning... 

Support Increments