<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:02:59 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Increments - Episodes Tagged with “Science”</title>
    <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/tags/science</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <description>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Science, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mayhem</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>Philosophy,Science,Ethics,Progress,Knowledge,Computer Science,Conversation,Error-Correction</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science"/>
<item>
  <title>#98 (C&amp;R Chap 10, Part III) - What is truth?</title>
  <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/98</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">0fea7698-ecf2-427d-94a1-bee55e1d72dd</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
  <author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</author>
  <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/https://chrt.fm/track/1F5B4D/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/0fea7698-ecf2-427d-94a1-bee55e1d72dd.mp3" length="81894248" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>The boys dive into a discussion on objective truth. What is Truth, really? Why is The Correspondence Theory of Truth the only game in town here? </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:24:54</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/episodes/0/0fea7698-ecf2-427d-94a1-bee55e1d72dd/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>"What is Truth?", said jesting podcasters, who then stuck around for an answer. Back at it again with The Conjectures and Refutations Series (part three) on Chapter 10: Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Can we say what truth is, even if we can never be certain we've found it? If not, can we say that science is approaching truth? How would we ever know? And why are so many theories of truth untrue?
We discuss
Ben's early reflections on  Abigail Shrier's book Bad Therapy 
Why did Popper feel the need to answer this particular "what is" question?
Can asking "what is truth" be a demogogic and bad-faith question?
The correspondence theory of truth vs The pragmatic theory of truth vs The coherence theory of truth 
Alfred Tarski's formalization of the correspondence theory of truth 
Are there problems with the correspondence theory?
The disagreement between Vaden and Deutsch on truth
References
Daniel Bonevac on the Correspondence theory of truth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlG_VaN1LHQ  
Tarki's 1944 paper (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54c161ffe4b063fc8ab03446/t/54c3c492e4b03dfa2a2e40f8/1422115986189/Tarski+-+The+Semantic+Conception+of+Truth.pdf) on the semantic conception of truth 
Tarki's 1933 paper (http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Tarski%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Truth%20in%20Formalized%20Languages.pdf) "On the concept of truth in formalized languages" 
Deutsch's 2022 talk on truth: Musings about Truth (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ-opI-jghs)
# Socials
Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani
Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link
Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments).
Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ)
It would be both useful, coherent, and correspond to our happiness if you signed up for our patreon or discord. Hit us up at incrementspodcast@gmail.com  
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>truth, pragmatism, popper, science, conjectures and refutations</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>&quot;What is Truth?&quot;, said jesting podcasters, who then stuck around for an answer. Back at it again with The Conjectures and Refutations Series (part three) on Chapter 10: Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Can we say what truth is, even if we can never be certain we&#39;ve found it? If not, can we say that science is approaching truth? How would we ever know? And why are so many theories of truth untrue?</p>

<h1>We discuss</h1>

<ul>
<li>Ben&#39;s early reflections on  Abigail Shrier&#39;s book Bad Therapy </li>
<li>Why did Popper feel the need to answer this particular &quot;what is&quot; question?</li>
<li>Can asking &quot;what is truth&quot; be a demogogic and bad-faith question?</li>
<li>The correspondence theory of truth vs The pragmatic theory of truth vs The coherence theory of truth </li>
<li>Alfred Tarski&#39;s formalization of the correspondence theory of truth </li>
<li>Are there problems with the correspondence theory?</li>
<li>The disagreement between Vaden and Deutsch on truth</li>
</ul>

<h1>References</h1>

<ul>
<li>Daniel Bonevac on the Correspondence theory of truth: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlG_VaN1LHQ" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlG_VaN1LHQ</a><br></li>
<li>Tarki&#39;s 1944 <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54c161ffe4b063fc8ab03446/t/54c3c492e4b03dfa2a2e40f8/1422115986189/Tarski+-+The+Semantic+Conception+of+Truth.pdf" rel="nofollow">paper</a> on the semantic conception of truth </li>
<li>Tarki&#39;s 1933 <a href="http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Tarski%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Truth%20in%20Formalized%20Languages.pdf" rel="nofollow">paper</a> &quot;On the concept of truth in formalized languages&quot; </li>
<li>Deutsch&#39;s 2022 talk on truth: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ-opI-jghs" rel="nofollow">Musings about Truth</a>
# Socials</li>
<li>Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani</li>
<li>Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link</li>
<li>Become a patreon subscriber <a href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations <a href="https://ko-fi.com/increments" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</li>
<li>Click dem like buttons on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ" rel="nofollow">youtube</a></li>
</ul>

<p>It would be both useful, coherent, and correspond to our happiness if you signed up for our patreon or discord. Hit us up at <a href="mailto:incrementspodcast@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">incrementspodcast@gmail.com</a> </p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>&quot;What is Truth?&quot;, said jesting podcasters, who then stuck around for an answer. Back at it again with The Conjectures and Refutations Series (part three) on Chapter 10: Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Can we say what truth is, even if we can never be certain we&#39;ve found it? If not, can we say that science is approaching truth? How would we ever know? And why are so many theories of truth untrue?</p>

<h1>We discuss</h1>

<ul>
<li>Ben&#39;s early reflections on  Abigail Shrier&#39;s book Bad Therapy </li>
<li>Why did Popper feel the need to answer this particular &quot;what is&quot; question?</li>
<li>Can asking &quot;what is truth&quot; be a demogogic and bad-faith question?</li>
<li>The correspondence theory of truth vs The pragmatic theory of truth vs The coherence theory of truth </li>
<li>Alfred Tarski&#39;s formalization of the correspondence theory of truth </li>
<li>Are there problems with the correspondence theory?</li>
<li>The disagreement between Vaden and Deutsch on truth</li>
</ul>

<h1>References</h1>

<ul>
<li>Daniel Bonevac on the Correspondence theory of truth: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlG_VaN1LHQ" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlG_VaN1LHQ</a><br></li>
<li>Tarki&#39;s 1944 <a href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54c161ffe4b063fc8ab03446/t/54c3c492e4b03dfa2a2e40f8/1422115986189/Tarski+-+The+Semantic+Conception+of+Truth.pdf" rel="nofollow">paper</a> on the semantic conception of truth </li>
<li>Tarki&#39;s 1933 <a href="http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Tarski%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Truth%20in%20Formalized%20Languages.pdf" rel="nofollow">paper</a> &quot;On the concept of truth in formalized languages&quot; </li>
<li>Deutsch&#39;s 2022 talk on truth: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ-opI-jghs" rel="nofollow">Musings about Truth</a>
# Socials</li>
<li>Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani</li>
<li>Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link</li>
<li>Become a patreon subscriber <a href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations <a href="https://ko-fi.com/increments" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</li>
<li>Click dem like buttons on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ" rel="nofollow">youtube</a></li>
</ul>

<p>It would be both useful, coherent, and correspond to our happiness if you signed up for our patreon or discord. Hit us up at <a href="mailto:incrementspodcast@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">incrementspodcast@gmail.com</a> </p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
