<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 21:31:14 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Increments - Episodes Tagged with “Free Speech”</title>
    <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/tags/free%20speech</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <description>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Science, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mayhem</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>Philosophy,Science,Ethics,Progress,Knowledge,Computer Science,Conversation,Error-Correction</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science"/>
<item>
  <title>#12 (C&amp;R Series, Ch. 17) - Public Opinion and Liberal Principles</title>
  <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/12</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-5860924</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</author>
  <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/https://chrt.fm/track/1F5B4D/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/0d11e797-56c1-45a5-9196-b8dcd25591c0.mp3" length="54366956" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:15:27</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;In the lead up to the American presidential election, one of the largest and most consequential expressions of public opinion, Ben and Vaden do what they always do and ask: "What does Popper say about this?" The second in the Conjectures and Refutations series, we cover Chapter 17: &lt;a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/6a6xkqlw7q5psx5/public_opinion.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Public Opinion and Liberal Principles&lt;/a&gt;.  Largely irrelevant and probably unhelpful, we touch &lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A thesis that the far left and right are converging vis-a-vis reactionary politics&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The idea that "truth is manifest", i.e. obvious &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The role of free speech and diversity of opinion&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Political polarization&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Libertarians and their hate of seatbelts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Send us some hate or some love at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chapter excerpt:&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;The following remarks were designed to provide material for debate at an international conference of liberals (...). My purpose was simply to lay the foundations for a good general discussion. Because I could assume liberal views in my audience I was largely concerned to challenge, rather than endorse, popular assumptions favourable to these views.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>horseshoe politics, public opinion, polarization, free speech, diversity</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>In the lead up to the American presidential election, one of the largest and most consequential expressions of public opinion, Ben and Vaden do what they always do and ask: &quot;What does Popper say about this?&quot; The second in the Conjectures and Refutations series, we cover Chapter 17: <a href='https://www.dropbox.com/s/6a6xkqlw7q5psx5/public_opinion.pdf?dl=0'>Public Opinion and Liberal Principles</a>.  Largely irrelevant and probably unhelpful, we touch </p><ul><li>A thesis that the far left and right are converging vis-a-vis reactionary politics</li><li>The idea that &quot;truth is manifest&quot;, i.e. obvious </li><li>The role of free speech and diversity of opinion</li><li>Political polarization</li><li>Libertarians and their hate of seatbelts</li></ul><p>Send us some hate or some love at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. <br/><br/>Chapter excerpt:<br/><em>The following remarks were designed to provide material for debate at an international conference of liberals (...). My purpose was simply to lay the foundations for a good general discussion. Because I could assume liberal views in my audience I was largely concerned to challenge, rather than endorse, popular assumptions favourable to these views.</em><br/><br/></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>In the lead up to the American presidential election, one of the largest and most consequential expressions of public opinion, Ben and Vaden do what they always do and ask: &quot;What does Popper say about this?&quot; The second in the Conjectures and Refutations series, we cover Chapter 17: <a href='https://www.dropbox.com/s/6a6xkqlw7q5psx5/public_opinion.pdf?dl=0'>Public Opinion and Liberal Principles</a>.  Largely irrelevant and probably unhelpful, we touch </p><ul><li>A thesis that the far left and right are converging vis-a-vis reactionary politics</li><li>The idea that &quot;truth is manifest&quot;, i.e. obvious </li><li>The role of free speech and diversity of opinion</li><li>Political polarization</li><li>Libertarians and their hate of seatbelts</li></ul><p>Send us some hate or some love at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. <br/><br/>Chapter excerpt:<br/><em>The following remarks were designed to provide material for debate at an international conference of liberals (...). My purpose was simply to lay the foundations for a good general discussion. Because I could assume liberal views in my audience I was largely concerned to challenge, rather than endorse, popular assumptions favourable to these views.</em><br/><br/></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
