<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:51:17 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Increments - Episodes Tagged with “Epistemic Modesty”</title>
    <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/tags/epistemic%20modesty</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 16:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <description>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Science, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mayhem</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. 
Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. 
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>Philosophy,Science,Ethics,Progress,Knowledge,Computer Science,Conversation,Error-Correction</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science"/>
<item>
  <title>#1 - Consequentialism I: Epistemic Modesty</title>
  <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/1</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-3818885</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 16:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</author>
  <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/https://chrt.fm/track/1F5B4D/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/e73d04da-5d22-4097-ae4c-e2502387ad0e.mp3" length="48969291" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:07:20</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/episodes/e/e73d04da-5d22-4097-ae4c-e2502387ad0e/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;We attempt to talk about &lt;em&gt;Epistemic Modesty&lt;/em&gt;: broadly, the idea that one should be modest in their beliefs when other people (with similar credentials) disagree with them. Vaden however, entirely immodestly, tries abandoning the subject because he’s scared of Ben’s forceful arguments and derails the conversation on to the entirely uncontroversial subject of which systems of moral decision making are best suited for moral progress. A flabbergasted Ben tries to keep up, but too little too late. Most of the time he's just trying to get his microphone to behave anyway. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;References:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WKPd79PESRGZHQ5GY/in-defence-of-epistemic-modesty"&gt;In defence of epistemic modesty&lt;/a&gt;; Greg Lewis. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ftshCQDZJ726RtY3s/against-modest-epistemology"&gt;Against Modest Epistemology&lt;/a&gt;; Eliezer Yudkowski. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/will-macaskill-moral-philosophy/"&gt;Podcast with Will MacAskill on moral uncertainty&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt; 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Epistemic Modesty, belief, morality, progress, decision making</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><p>We attempt to talk about <em>Epistemic Modesty</em>: broadly, the idea that one should be modest in their beliefs when other people (with similar credentials) disagree with them. Vaden however, entirely immodestly, tries abandoning the subject because he’s scared of Ben’s forceful arguments and derails the conversation on to the entirely uncontroversial subject of which systems of moral decision making are best suited for moral progress. A flabbergasted Ben tries to keep up, but too little too late. Most of the time he&apos;s just trying to get his microphone to behave anyway. </p><p><b><em>References:</em></b></p><ul><li><a href='https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WKPd79PESRGZHQ5GY/in-defence-of-epistemic-modesty'>In defence of epistemic modesty</a>; Greg Lewis. </li><li><a href='https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ftshCQDZJ726RtY3s/against-modest-epistemology'>Against Modest Epistemology</a>; Eliezer Yudkowski. </li><li><a href='https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/will-macaskill-moral-philosophy/'>Podcast with Will MacAskill on moral uncertainty</a>.  </li></ul></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><p>We attempt to talk about <em>Epistemic Modesty</em>: broadly, the idea that one should be modest in their beliefs when other people (with similar credentials) disagree with them. Vaden however, entirely immodestly, tries abandoning the subject because he’s scared of Ben’s forceful arguments and derails the conversation on to the entirely uncontroversial subject of which systems of moral decision making are best suited for moral progress. A flabbergasted Ben tries to keep up, but too little too late. Most of the time he&apos;s just trying to get his microphone to behave anyway. </p><p><b><em>References:</em></b></p><ul><li><a href='https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WKPd79PESRGZHQ5GY/in-defence-of-epistemic-modesty'>In defence of epistemic modesty</a>; Greg Lewis. </li><li><a href='https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ftshCQDZJ726RtY3s/against-modest-epistemology'>Against Modest Epistemology</a>; Eliezer Yudkowski. </li><li><a href='https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/will-macaskill-moral-philosophy/'>Podcast with Will MacAskill on moral uncertainty</a>.  </li></ul></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
