<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 06:18:08 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Increments - Episodes Tagged with “Einstein”</title>
    <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/tags/einstein</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <description>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Science, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mayhem</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>Philosophy,Science,Ethics,Progress,Knowledge,Computer Science,Conversation,Error-Correction</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science"/>
<item>
  <title>#22 - Thinking Through Thought Experiments</title>
  <link>https://www.incrementspodcast.com/22</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">Buzzsprout-8336503</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</author>
  <enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/https://chrt.fm/track/1F5B4D/aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/90eb6546-fbe6-40fa-ab30-2e73bc2dc2da.mp3" length="54955972" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:16:16</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/3/3229e340-4bf1-42a5-a5b7-4f508a27131c/cover.jpg?v=18"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;In this episode, we discuss Peter Singer's famous drowning child thought experiment, the role of moral theories, and the role of thought experiments in moral reasoning. From our perspectives, the conversation went something like this:&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ben's POV: Bravely and boldly trying to think through problems, Ben puts forward a &lt;em&gt;stunningly&lt;/em&gt; insightful theory about the role of moral argumentation. Vaden, jealous of the profundity of Ben's message, tries to disagree but can't. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Vaden's POV: What the eff is Ben talking about? I disagree. No wait nvm I agree. Let's change the subject. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;References in intro segment:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OgXqC9rVNo&amp;amp;ab_channel=OxfordKarlPopperSociety" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Talk by Joseph Agassi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert Sapolsky's book &lt;a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Behave-Biology-Humans-Best-Worst/dp/1594205078" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Behave&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Milgram experiments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Stanford Prison Experiments&lt;/a&gt; (see also: Radio Lab's &lt;a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/episodes/180092-the-bad-show" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Bad Show&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;References in main&amp;nbsp; segment:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://personal.lse.ac.uk/robert49/teaching/mm/articles/Singer_1972Famine.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Famine, Affluence, and Morality&lt;/a&gt; by Peter Singer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.preventsuffering.org/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering&lt;/a&gt; (OPIS)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_and_Persons" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Reasons and Persons&lt;/a&gt; by Derek Parfit&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Galileo's thought experiment: &lt;a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-020-00263-y" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Parts of Falling Objects&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Einstein's thought experiments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;Put on a suit and drown a child before sending your best moral theory to &lt;em&gt;incrementspodcast@gmail.com&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>peter singer, thought experiments, derek parfit, einstein</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we discuss Peter Singer's famous drowning child thought experiment, the role of moral theories, and the role of thought experiments in moral reasoning. From our perspectives, the conversation went something like this:&nbsp; <br><br>Ben's POV: Bravely and boldly trying to think through problems, Ben puts forward a <em>stunningly</em> insightful theory about the role of moral argumentation. Vaden, jealous of the profundity of Ben's message, tries to disagree but can't. <br><br>Vaden's POV: What the eff is Ben talking about? I disagree. No wait nvm I agree. Let's change the subject. <br><br><em>References in intro segment:&nbsp;</em></p><ul><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OgXqC9rVNo&amp;ab_channel=OxfordKarlPopperSociety" rel="nofollow noopener">Talk by Joseph Agassi</a></li><li>Robert Sapolsky's book <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Behave-Biology-Humans-Best-Worst/dp/1594205078" rel="nofollow noopener">Behave</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener">Milgram experiments</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener">Stanford Prison Experiments</a> (see also: Radio Lab's <a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/episodes/180092-the-bad-show" rel="nofollow noopener">The Bad Show</a>)</li></ul><p><em>References in main&nbsp; segment:</em></p><ul><li><a href="https://personal.lse.ac.uk/robert49/teaching/mm/articles/Singer_1972Famine.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener">Famine, Affluence, and Morality</a> by Peter Singer</li><li><a href="https://www.preventsuffering.org/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering</a> (OPIS)&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_and_Persons" rel="nofollow noopener">Reasons and Persons</a> by Derek Parfit</li><li>Galileo's thought experiment: <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-020-00263-y" rel="nofollow noopener">Parts of Falling Objects</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments" rel="nofollow noopener">Einstein's thought experiments</a></li></ul><p><em>&nbsp;</em><br>Put on a suit and drown a child before sending your best moral theory to <em>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</em>.&nbsp;<br><br></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we discuss Peter Singer's famous drowning child thought experiment, the role of moral theories, and the role of thought experiments in moral reasoning. From our perspectives, the conversation went something like this:&nbsp; <br><br>Ben's POV: Bravely and boldly trying to think through problems, Ben puts forward a <em>stunningly</em> insightful theory about the role of moral argumentation. Vaden, jealous of the profundity of Ben's message, tries to disagree but can't. <br><br>Vaden's POV: What the eff is Ben talking about? I disagree. No wait nvm I agree. Let's change the subject. <br><br><em>References in intro segment:&nbsp;</em></p><ul><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OgXqC9rVNo&amp;ab_channel=OxfordKarlPopperSociety" rel="nofollow noopener">Talk by Joseph Agassi</a></li><li>Robert Sapolsky's book <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Behave-Biology-Humans-Best-Worst/dp/1594205078" rel="nofollow noopener">Behave</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener">Milgram experiments</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment" rel="nofollow noopener">Stanford Prison Experiments</a> (see also: Radio Lab's <a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/episodes/180092-the-bad-show" rel="nofollow noopener">The Bad Show</a>)</li></ul><p><em>References in main&nbsp; segment:</em></p><ul><li><a href="https://personal.lse.ac.uk/robert49/teaching/mm/articles/Singer_1972Famine.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener">Famine, Affluence, and Morality</a> by Peter Singer</li><li><a href="https://www.preventsuffering.org/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering</a> (OPIS)&nbsp;</li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_and_Persons" rel="nofollow noopener">Reasons and Persons</a> by Derek Parfit</li><li>Galileo's thought experiment: <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-020-00263-y" rel="nofollow noopener">Parts of Falling Objects</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments" rel="nofollow noopener">Einstein's thought experiments</a></li></ul><p><em>&nbsp;</em><br>Put on a suit and drown a child before sending your best moral theory to <em>incrementspodcast@gmail.com</em>.&nbsp;<br><br></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments">Support Increments</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
