web01.fireside.fm Sat, 30 May 2026 09:22:14 -0500 Fireside (https://fireside.fm) Increments - Episodes Tagged with “Deduction” https://www.incrementspodcast.com/tags/deduction Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:00:00 -0700 Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. en-us episodic Science, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mayhem Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani Vaden Masrani, a senior research scientist in machine learning, and Ben Chugg, a PhD student in statistics, get into trouble arguing about everything except machine learning and statistics. Coherence is somewhere on the horizon. Bribes, suggestions, love-mail and hate-mail all welcome at incrementspodcast@gmail.com. no Philosophy,Science,Ethics,Progress,Knowledge,Computer Science,Conversation,Error-Correction Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani incrementspodcast@gmail.com #75 - The Problem of Induction, Relitigated (w/ Tamler Sommers) https://www.incrementspodcast.com/75 620c85f4-0377-4a5a-ba7e-71006bcb89b4 Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:00:00 -0700 Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani full Ben Chugg and Vaden Masrani When Very Bad Wizards meets Very Culty Popperians. Famed philosopher, podcaster, and Kant-hater Tamler Sommers joins the boys for a spirited disagreement over Popper, and whether he solved the Problem of Induction. 1:41:13 no <p>When Very Bad Wizards meets Very Culty Popperians. We finally decided to have a real life professional philosopher on the pod to call us out on our nonsense, and are honored to have on Tamler Sommers, from the esteemed Very Bad Wizards podcast, to argue with us about the Problem of Induction. Did Popper solve it, or does his proposed solution, like all the other attempts, "fail decisively"? </p> <p>(Warning: One of the two hosts maaay have revealed their Popperian dogmatism a bit throughout this episode. Whichever host that is - they shall remain unnamed - apologizes quietly and stubbornly under their breath.) </p> <p>Check out <a href="https://www.tamlersommers.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Tamler's website</a>, his podcast (<a href="https://verybadwizards.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Very Bad Wizards</a>), or follow him on twitter (@tamler). </p> We discuss <ul> <li>What is the problem of induction? </li> <li>Whether regularities really exist in nature</li> <li>The difference between certainty and justification </li> <li>Popper's solution to the problem of induction </li> <li>If whiskey will taste like orange juice next week</li> <li>What makes a good theory?</li> <li>Why prediction is secondary to explanation for Popper </li> <li>If science and meditiation are in conflict </li> <li>The boundaries of science<br></li> </ul> References <ul> <li><a href="https://verybadwizards.com/episode/episode-294-the-scandal-of-philosophy-humes-problem-of-induction" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Very Bad Wizards episode on induction</a></li> <li><a href="https://home.csulb.edu/%7Ecwallis/100/articles/salmon.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">The problem of induction, by Wesley Salmon</a></li> <li><a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/#HumeProb" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Hume on induction</a></li> </ul> Errata <ul> <li>Vaden mentions in the episode how "Einstein's theory is better because it can explain earth's gravitational constant". He got some of the details wrong here - it's actually the inverse square law, not the gravitational constant. Listen to Edward Witten explain it much better <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_9RqsHYEAs" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">here</a>. </li> </ul> Socials <ul> <li>Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani, @tamler</li> <li>Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link</li> <li>Trust in our regularity and get exclusive bonus content by becoming a patreon subscriber <a href="https://www.patreon.com/Increments" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">here</a>. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations <a href="https://ko-fi.com/increments" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">here</a>.</li> <li>Click dem like buttons on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube</a></li> </ul> <p>If you are a Very Bad Wizards listener, hello! We're exactly like Tamler and David, except younger. Come join the Cult of Popper over at <a href="mailto:incrementspodcast@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">incrementspodcast@gmail.com</a> </p> <p>Image credit: From this <a href="https://aeon.co/essays/hume-is-the-amiable-modest-generous-philosopher-we-need-today" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Aeon essay on Hume</a>. Illustration by Petra Eriksson at Handsome Frank. Special Guest: Tamler Sommers.</p> induction, popper, belief, certainty, justification, deduction, logic When Very Bad Wizards meets Very Culty Popperians. We finally decided to have a real life professional philosopher on the pod to call us out on our nonsense, and are honored to have on Tamler Sommers, from the esteemed Very Bad Wizards podcast, to argue with us about the Problem of Induction. Did Popper solve it, or does his proposed solution, like all the other attempts, "fail decisively"?

(Warning: One of the two hosts maaay have revealed their Popperian dogmatism a bit throughout this episode. Whichever host that is - they shall remain unnamed - apologizes quietly and stubbornly under their breath.)

Check out Tamler's website, his podcast (Very Bad Wizards), or follow him on twitter (@tamler).

We discuss
  • What is the problem of induction?
  • Whether regularities really exist in nature
  • The difference between certainty and justification
  • Popper's solution to the problem of induction
  • If whiskey will taste like orange juice next week
  • What makes a good theory?
  • Why prediction is secondary to explanation for Popper
  • If science and meditiation are in conflict
  • The boundaries of science
References Errata
  • Vaden mentions in the episode how "Einstein's theory is better because it can explain earth's gravitational constant". He got some of the details wrong here - it's actually the inverse square law, not the gravitational constant. Listen to Edward Witten explain it much better here.
Socials
  • Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani, @tamler
  • Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link
  • Trust in our regularity and get exclusive bonus content by becoming a patreon subscriber here. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here.
  • Click dem like buttons on youtube

If you are a Very Bad Wizards listener, hello! We're exactly like Tamler and David, except younger. Come join the Cult of Popper over at incrementspodcast@gmail.com

Image credit: From this Aeon essay on Hume. Illustration by Petra Eriksson at Handsome Frank.

Special Guest: Tamler Sommers.

Support Increments

]]> When Very Bad Wizards meets Very Culty Popperians. We finally decided to have a real life professional philosopher on the pod to call us out on our nonsense, and are honored to have on Tamler Sommers, from the esteemed Very Bad Wizards podcast, to argue with us about the Problem of Induction. Did Popper solve it, or does his proposed solution, like all the other attempts, "fail decisively"?

(Warning: One of the two hosts maaay have revealed their Popperian dogmatism a bit throughout this episode. Whichever host that is - they shall remain unnamed - apologizes quietly and stubbornly under their breath.)

Check out Tamler's website, his podcast (Very Bad Wizards), or follow him on twitter (@tamler).

We discuss
  • What is the problem of induction?
  • Whether regularities really exist in nature
  • The difference between certainty and justification
  • Popper's solution to the problem of induction
  • If whiskey will taste like orange juice next week
  • What makes a good theory?
  • Why prediction is secondary to explanation for Popper
  • If science and meditiation are in conflict
  • The boundaries of science
References Errata
  • Vaden mentions in the episode how "Einstein's theory is better because it can explain earth's gravitational constant". He got some of the details wrong here - it's actually the inverse square law, not the gravitational constant. Listen to Edward Witten explain it much better here.
Socials
  • Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani, @tamler
  • Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link
  • Trust in our regularity and get exclusive bonus content by becoming a patreon subscriber here. Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here.
  • Click dem like buttons on youtube

If you are a Very Bad Wizards listener, hello! We're exactly like Tamler and David, except younger. Come join the Cult of Popper over at incrementspodcast@gmail.com

Image credit: From this Aeon essay on Hume. Illustration by Petra Eriksson at Handsome Frank.

Special Guest: Tamler Sommers.

Support Increments

]]>